05/05/26 09:51:00
Printable Page
05/05 09:49 CDT Chef declines to answer money questions in assault trial of
former Patriots player Diggs
Chef declines to answer money questions in assault trial of former Patriots
player Diggs
By LEAH WILLINGHAM
Associated Press
BOSTON (AP) --- A woman who worked as a live-in personal chef for former New
England Patriots receiver Stefon Diggs declined to answer questions Tuesday
about financial demands made on her behalf, as defense attorneys pressed her
over claims she was owed money and inconsistencies in what she said she was
paid.
Defense attorneys pressed Jamila "Mila" Adams about money she said she was owed
after working as a live-in chef. She testified she was paid about $2,000 a week
and believed she had not been fully compensated after being sent home. They
pointed to a $19,000 demand made on her behalf and suggested the amount grew
over time, culminating in a separate claim that her attorney sought $5.5
million.
Diggs has pleaded not guilty to a felony strangulation charge and a misdemeanor
assault and battery charge stemming from a December incident at his home.
When asked about the $5.5 million claim, Adams said, "I can't speak on that,"
and at other points told jurors, "I don't understand the question" and "I don't
know how to answer the question."
Defense attorneys also questioned Adams about a public statement she issued
Feb. 13 in which she said, "I have never sought money to settle this matter,"
and about hiring a lawyer by mid-April. Adams said she retained an attorney for
a workers' compensation claim, saying she believed she had been injured on the
job.
They challenged her accounting of what she was owed, presenting records of
payments and suggesting she had sought compensation for weeks she did not work.
Adams said she had been confused about the amount and "sent the incorrect
amount," maintaining she believed she was owed money.
Prosecutors pushed back on the defense's financial-motive argument, eliciting
testimony that Adams viewed the dispute as a wage issue, not a settlement. She
said her statement that she had "never sought money to settle this matter"
referred to the criminal case and that she later retained an attorney for a
workers' compensation claim after she believed she was injured on the job.
At times during her second day on the stand, Adams was instructed by the judge
to answer questions directly and not include additional details beyond what was
asked. Portions of her responses were struck from the record as nonresponsive,
with jurors told to disregard them.
"This is not an opportunity for you to interject your own narrative," Judge
Jeanmarie Carroll, told her at one point, warning that continued nonresponsive
answers could result in her testimony being stricken.
The testimony followed sharply conflicting accounts presented to jurors a day
earlier.
Adams testified Monday that Diggs "smacked me with an open hand" before
wrapping his arm around her neck and choking her, leaving her struggling to
breathe. She described what she called a "complicated" relationship, saying it
had previously been sexual but was not at the time of the alleged assault. She
said she lived in his home, preparing meals and snacks, and had known him for
more than four years.
Defense attorneys told jurors the alleged attack never happened, pointing to a
lack of medical records, photos or video documenting injuries and saying no one
else in the home reported seeing or hearing anything unusual. They also
suggested Adams had a financial motive.
Prosecutors say the case centers on what happened on Dec. 2, when they allege
Diggs entered Adams' bedroom, slapped her and put her in a headlock that made
it difficult to breathe.
A jury was seated Monday in Norfolk County District Court in Dedham.
|